DAYDREAMS


Pocket Listings Hurt The Seller

 

 

 

 

 

Pocket of $$One sees and hears a lot these days about listings that never go into the multiple listing service data base. This type of listing is called a “pocket listing.” In my opinion all a pocket listing does is guarantee the listing agent both ends of the commission, the listing and selling commissions. This type of exclusive listing cuts profit out of the seller’s pocket. The client who’s selling doesn’t have the advantage of exposing the property to the widest number of potential buyers, thus the competition which would occur is severely diminished. The more people who know the property is available, the higher the potential selling price. There’s a direct correlation between the two.

The following is a guest opinion piece by Doug Miller, executive director of Consumer Advocates in American Real Estate (CAARE)

First, it needs to be understood that pocket listings take many forms. For our discussion, the biggest culprits are pocket listings that direct buyers to the listing broker and fail to offer compensation to cooperating brokers.

In almost all cases, pocket listings are harmful to consumers. They certainly do not serve their stated purpose of gauging the demand or pricing of a property before it hits the market — that is a ruse used to manipulate clients. Pocket listings exclude the brokerage community by refusing to share commissions. That’s bad for consumers.

In a hot market, pocket listings will almost always generate offers. That is not “test marketing” to gauge demand or pricing. Worse, when that offer comes in, the seller is placed in the undesirable situation of either accepting an offer generated by a semiclosed marketplace or rejecting that offer and putting the house on the MLS. The result is to place the seller in a decision clouded by duress. No fiduciary should ever put their clients in such a situation. And no fiduciary (broker or agent) who is financially biased with a double fee should ever “advise” their clients in this situation, as such advice would certainly be construed to be self‐serving.

Pocket listings exist to generate a double fee. That’s it. Every argument in favor of pocket listings is little more than self‐serving rationalizations that do not survive logical analysis. Mega brokers are addicted to collecting double fees and they are willing to mislead their own agents and clients about pocket listings to do it. If your broker promotes pocket listings, then you should consider moving. A broker who uses its supervisory capacity granted by state licensing privilege to engage in such abusive conduct may be violating licensing laws. For every sales tactic used to misguide clients about pocket listings, there are real and honest solutions that involve serious marketing strategies to actually sell the house. We believe that advisers who suggest these arrangements to their clients fall into the category known as “predatory fiduciaries.”

Posted in House Hunting


To Buy or to Rent: that is the question…

 

questionmakr

I don’t love the websites, Trulia or Zillow. Their content can be old, fake or generally inaccurate.

However, this is kind of a cool link to a table on Trulia that in a general way weighs the benefits of buying over renting  (or vice versa)  for your specific situation. Check it out!

http://www.trulia.com/rent_vs_buy/

 

Posted in House Hunting


The 5 Fastest Moving Markets in the US

 

 

sale pending Hudson

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If you are looking to buy a house in one of these five cities, you best move quickly. In these five housing markets, most property is not staying available for as long as it is in other parts of the country. Trulia’s Chief Economist Jed Kolbo conducted the study that revealed which cities had the lowest percentage of homes for sale that were on the market for at least two months. The study also compared this year’s figures to last year’s, and compared the year-over-year change in asking prices. Here are the five fastest-moving housing markets.

5. San Diego, California

Beautiful San Diego, California comes in at number 5 on the list, with only 41 percent of property for sale remaining on the market for at least two months, down from 45 percent one year ago. San Diego also saw a 14 percent rise in asking prices. San Diego marks the first of four cities from California on this list.

4. Denver, Colorado

Denver, Colorado is number four on the list, with just 38 percent of houses staying on the market for at least two months. This is down sharply from last year’s 47 percent, showing that homes in Denver are selling much faster than they were one year ago. Denver’s economy and beautiful setting on the edge of the Rockies continues to draw people in.

3. San Francisco, California

In at number three is San Francisco, California, one of the most expensive housing markets in the country. Only 32 percent of homes in San Francisco stay on the market for two months or more, down slightly from 36 percent last year. Asking prices are higher as well, 15.1 percent more than last year.[2]

2. San Jose, California

San Jose, California has the second lowest percent of homes on the market for two months, with just 31 percent lasting that long. Asking prices are 13.4 percent higher. Much like San Francisco, San Jose’s economy and housing market are being propelled forward by the tech boom and the influx of well-paid tech workers.

1. Oakland, California

The fewest homes remain on the market for two months in Oakland, California, with just 29 percent of homes lasting that long. This is a slight improvement from last year’s 31 percent figure. Asking prices in Oakland are rising faster than in any other city on the list as well, with a 22.7 percent increase.

Posted in House Hunting


Bidding Wars Back In S.F.

 

brick stairs

J.K. Dineen

After getting outbid on three houses, Shura Kelly decided not to mess around with 117 De Montfort St.True, it was off of Ocean Avenue in Ingleside Heights – not the Sunset District where she and her firefighter partner, James “Denis” Quirke, grew up and would have preferred to stay. But the Sunset had become too expensive and the little Marina-style 1920s house had charm: original gumwood, beveled glass doors, a sunny kitchen and a spacious backyard with potential.

Kelly, who runs a doggy day-care business, and her partner “came in strong” with an offer of $810,000, 35 percent over the asking price of $599,000.

The good news was that they beat out 46 other offers. The bad news was that someone else offered more than 50 percent over asking. The sale closed April 11. “I thought for sure we had it but someone went bananas and offered $910,000 for a house in the Ingleside,” Kelly said.

Kelly’s frustration is par for the course in a housing market that, with the exception of a few San Francisco neighborhoods, has now surpassed both the early 1990s dot-com boom and the run-up to the 2008 crash. Prices have climbed 33 percent since 2011, with many neighborhoods exceeding that.

And while bidding wars have long been part of buying a home in Noe Valley, Glen Park and Cole Valley, they are now just as fierce in less fashionable areas such as the Excelsior, Mission Terrace and Ingleside.

Citywide, properties are now commanding an average of 10.7 percent more than asking price, according to Paragon Real Estate Group, with Bernal Heights leading the pack at an average of 21 percent over asking. That’s up from April 2012, when homes were selling for an average of 3.5 percent over asking.

“Right now I have four buyers that are working to find properties, and they are all cash buyers,” said Chris Stafford, a Paragon broker. “They are ready to write a check tomorrow, and we can’t seem to get them into places because the bidding wars are just a little crazy.”

Imbalance extreme

The art of driving prices up through competition has been around as long as there has been swampland to sell and was certainly prevalent during the bubbles of 1999 and 2006. But this time the imbalance between supply and demand is even more extreme, according to people in the business.

The combination of rapid job growth, a soaring tech IPO market and foreign investors has made San Francisco the most expensive – and competitive – real estate market in the United States, according to Ken Rosen, chairman of the Fisher Center for Real Estate at UC Berkeley. The Bay Area has added 75,000 new jobs over the last three years, and 58,000 more San Franciscans are working than at the beginning of 2010, according to California’s Employment Development Department.

At the same time, just 0.3 percent of existing housing stock is on the market, the second lowest percentage in the United States, after San Jose.
Realtor Pete Brannigan of Brown & Co. said “everyone is looking at the same properties and trying to figure out” how much over asking it is going to go.

He said buyers have become conditioned to the idea that everything is going to go 10 percent over asking. So if you price the property where it realistically might sell, some buyers will wrongly assume they are out of the running.

Start low to spark interest

“It’s almost a requirement to price at the low end of the range to generate the interest,” he said.

Brannigan is currently selling a 3,600-square-foot house at 525 28th St. in Noe Valley. It was listed at $2.799 million. After seven days the seller had three offers, with the top one coming in 20 percent over asking.

All three buyers were offering all cash.

“You’ve got a lot of cash buyers who turn around and get a loan, but the deal is not dependent on them getting a loan,” said Brannigan. “If they got stuck they could still perform.”

He said buyers and investors are getting desperate.

“People are knocking on doors and making big, fat offers that are hard to refuse, especially on Liberty Hill,” he said, referring to the neighborhood on the Mission-Noe Valley border where Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg bought a place.

Karmyn Johnson, a 27-year-old actor and writer who has lived on De Montfort Street in Ingleside Heights since she was 12, said she has received five solicitations from investors interested in buying the family home.

“We like this neighborhood – it’s convenient. We don’t want to live anywhere else,” she said. “I guess it’s nice to have people throwing money at you when you want to sell your house, but when you don’t, it’s a little suspicious.”

Pressure on neighborhoods

Pressure on neighborhoods like Ingleside is coming from both directions: Families are not just getting squeezed out of more expensive San Francisco neighborhoods, but also desirable Peninsula communities such as Burlingame and Palo Alto.

“If you can’t buy a house for a million dollars in Bernal Heights anymore – and it’s really hard – where are you going to go?” said Frank Castaldini of Coldwell Banker Real Estate.

Middle class priced out

 

 At City Hall the bidding wars underscore what has become an increasingly explosive political problem over the past year: the lack of affordable housing. With median home prices over $1 million, a recent Trulia report found only 17 percent of city teachers could afford a home in the city.

Much of the new housing coming on line is expensive: condos selling for $1,100 per square foot or renting for $4.50 per square foot. Mayor Ed Lee has made housing a priority, vowing to build or rehab 30,000 units by 2020, much of it affordable. About 2,125 new housing units have opened since December, the majority of them rentals.

“Housing affordability is the biggest single issue facing the Bay Area economy,” said Rosen. “Booms have unintended consequences.”

Peter Cohen of the Council on Community Housing Organizations, which represents affordable housing groups, said “increasingly, middle-class people are finding themselves totally priced out of this radical housing market.” He advocates for price controls that target a variety of demographics from the poor to the middle class.

“You have speculators going against families – you know who is going to win in that battle,” he said. “It makes average families uncompetitive.”

Hanging on to S.F. ZIP

Meanwhile, Kelly, who is leaving her long-time Sunset rental because her landlord is moving into the house, finally found a place. In May, she managed to submit a winning bid on Sears Street in the Outer Mission – a 1911 Arts and Crafts house on a dead-end street.

“It wasn’t the first choice but it’s a good neighborhood, they love the house, and we were happy they were able to stay in San Francisco,” said Kevin Birmingham of Park North Real Estate, Kelly’s broker.

Kelly said she is enamored with the house, the street and the neighborhood. But as a native she said she is a “little bitter about having to leave the Sunset and a little shocked as a native how nuts real estate prices are.”

“We are hanging on to a San Francisco ZIP code by our fingertips,” she said.

 

© 2014 Hearst Communications, Inc.

 

Posted in House Hunting


Least Affordable/ Most Affordable

The Five Most and Least Affordable Housing Markets for the Middle Class

The middle class in the United States is getting squeezed out of some housing markets, but not out of all of them. Trulia Chief Economist Jed Kolko issued a study that attempted to determine which housing markets were affordable for the middle class and which were not. He based affordability on what percent of homes for sale were affordable to the middle class based on the median household income of each metro area. He defined affordable as when the monthly housing expense, including mortgage, insurance, and property taxes, was less than 31 percent of the area’s median household income. Kolko found that housing was primarily affordable to the middle class in 80 of the largest 100 U.S. metro areas.

Here are the five most affordable and five least affordable housing markets for the middle class.

Most Affordable Housing Markets:

#5: Columbia, South Carolina

82 percent of homes in Columbia are affordable, down from 88 percent in May, 2013.

#4: Gary, Indiana

83 percent of homes in Gary meet the affordability criteria, down from 87 percent a year ago.

#3: Dayton, Ohio

83 percent of homes in Dayton are also affordable, down from 89 percent last year.

#2: Toledo, Ohio

84 percent of homes in Toledo are affordable, down from 87 percent last year.

#1: Akron, Ohio

Akron had the highest percentage of affordable housing at 86 percent, down just 2 percentage points from 88 percent last year. [2]

While most of the most affordable markets are in the Midwest, the least affordable markets are primarily on the coasts.

Least Affordable Housing Markets

#5: San Diego, California

Just 28 percent of homes in San Diego are affordable to the middle class. This is down significantly from the 39 percent that were affordable one year ago.

#4: New York, New York

Only 25 percent, or one in four, homes in New York are affordable to the middle class. The average square footage of an affordable home in New York is also quite low at just 1000 square feet.

#3: Orange County, California

Just 24 percent of homes in Orange County are affordable.

#2: Los Angeles, California

Only 23 percent of homes in L.A. are affordable to the middle class, down from 31 percent last year.

#1: San Francisco, California

San Francisco remains the least affordable housing market, with a mere 14 percent of homes affordable to the middle class.

 

Posted in House Hunting


All Cash Offers

Housing paradox: All-cash sales rise as investor sales dip

The headline on Thursday’s release from the National Association of Realtors might sound contradictory.

“All-cash sales up while distressed sales and investors decline,” it reads.

Investors are often buyers in all-cash home sales. How can cash deals be up if investors are hanging back?

An explanation from NAR’s chief economist offers some insight into how much today’s in-recovery real estate market is driven by people with financial resources, whether savings, home equity or just good credit. At the same time, not-so-well-off Americans — such as first-time buyers — remain underrepresented due to a tight supply of homes for sale at the lower priced end of the market and credit restrictions.

First, here are the key statistics in the Realtors’ new data:

  • All-cash purchases of homes were 33% of the market in the first quarter, compared with 31% in 2013 and 29% in 2012.
  • Investors’ share of all buyers was 19% in the first quarter, the same as in 2013 but down from 20% in 2012.
  • Sales of distressed homes — those are foreclosures and short sales — fell to 15%. That’s down from 17% in 2013 and 26% in 2012.  Investors snapped up these bargain-price homes by the thousands to turn into rentals the past several years.

Lawrence Yun, NAR’s chief economist, points out investors aren’t the only buyers who can afford to buy a home without taking out a loan.

Another group is aging Baby Boomers, who bought homes decades ago and now are trading down to smaller homes. They have decades of accumulated equity to reinvest in a home purchase.

A separate NAR study shows trade-down buyers rose to 29% of all buyers last year from 25% in 2012 and 23% in 2011.

Who else pays cash for homes? The majority of international buyers, Yun says.

It may be no coincidence then that in Florida, all-cash sales were more than half of all homes sold in January through March.

“Florida is the most popular state for international buyers, who generally pay cash, as well as vacation-home buyers who frequently pay cash. In addition, downsizing retirees are known to pay cash from the proceeds of their homes in the north,” Yun says.

Other states that stood out for all-cash sales in the first quarter were Nevada, Arizona and West Virginia, accounting for nearly four of 10 transactions, according to NAR.

Posted in House Hunting


What Buyers DON’T Want

WhatBuyersdontwant2-1

Posted in House Hunting, Uncategorized


What Features Do Buyers Value?

What-Features-Do-Buyers-Value-in-a-Home-1

Posted in House Hunting


Indian Summer’s Bounty

better flowers 10.13

Posted in Landscape


First Roses of Spring 2013

reflected roses

Posted in Landscape



RSS Feed